SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Guj) 83

R.B.MEHTA, J.M.SHELAT
SAINIK KANAIYALAL KALUMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.R.SOMPURA, I.C.BHATT

R. B. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) AN Act to provide for the constitution and regulation of a Force called the Railway Protection Force for the better protection and security of railway property.

( 2 ) THE preamble therefore makes it clear that the object of the Act is to constitute a Force which is called the Railway Protection Force for the better protection and security of the railway property. By sec. 5 designation of the members of the Force is given under which designation there are A Class officers which comprise of the Inspector the Sub-Inspector and the Assistant sub-inspector. It may be mentioned that Sardulsing is a sub-inspector and Rohitlal is an assistant sub-inspector. There is also B Class of officers comprising other ranks of Head Rakshak Senior Rakshak and Rakshak. The duties of the members of the Force are provided for in sec. 11 of the said Act.

( 3 ) 11 It shall be the duty of every superior officer and member of the Force (A) promptly to execute all orders lawfully issued to him by his superior authority (b) to protect and safeguard railway property; (c) to remove any obstruction in the movement of the railway property (d) to do any other act conducive to the better protect























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top