SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Guj) 102

J.M.SHELAT, K.T.DESAI, M.R.MODY
LALU JELA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AKSHAY H.MEHTA, B.R.SOMPURA

K. T. DESAI, M. R. MODY, J. M. SHELAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a criminal appeal by five persons who were convicted after a single trial by the Sessions Judge of Panch Mahals. Two other persons convicted at the same trial have filed separate appeals. When the appeal came up for admission some difficulties presented themselves. One of them arises out of section 421 Cri. Pro. Code which reads as under: (1) On receiving the petition and copy under section 419 or section 420 the appellate Court shall peruse the same and if it considers that there is no sufficient ground for interfering it may dismiss the appeal summarily: provided that no appeal presented under section 419 shall be dismissed unless the appellant or his Pleader has had a reasonable opportunity of being heard in support of the same. (2) Before dismissing an appeal under this section the Court may call for the record of the case but shall not be bound to do so.

( 2 ) AS the appeal by the five convicted persons was filed as one appeal the question is whether under section 421 Cri. Pro. Code a part of the appeal namely that relating to one of the convicted persons or the appeals of some of the convicted persons can be dismissed sum







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top