SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Guj) 96

A.R.BAKSHI, N.M.MIABHOY
JAYANTILAL AMRATLAL SHODHAN – Appellant
Versus
F. N. RANA,commissioner,baroda DIVISION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.R.SOMPURA, I.M.NANAVATI, TRILOK J.PATEL

N. M. MIABHOY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner Shri Jayantilal Amratlal Shodhan prays for a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction or order for setting aside two notifications under secs. 4 and 6 and proceedings under sec. 5a of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (I of 1894) (hereafter called the Act) and for directing the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 not to take action under those notifications and proceedings. Alternatively the petitioner prays for a writ of certiorari or any other writ direction or order for quashing the enquiry under sec. 5a of the Act and for setting aside the notification under sec. 6 of the Act.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the owner of final plot No. 686 of the Ellisbridge Town Planning Scheme No. 3 situated in Moje Chhadavad City Taluka Ahmedabad admeasuring 7018 sq. yards. The respondent No. 1 was at the relevant time the Commissioner Baroda Division Baroda. He issued a notification under sec. 4 of the Act on 1st September 1960 notifying that about 3200 square yards out of the above plot were needed or were likely to be needed for a certain public purpose. This notification was publ






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top