SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Guj) 54

M.R.MODY, N.M.MIABHOY
BAI HANIFA JUSAB – Appellant
Versus
MEMON DADA A. GANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: S.B.VAKIL, S.K.ZAVERI, S.M.SHETH

M. R. MODY, J.

( 1 ) AN important question regarding the revocability of licences arises in this second appeal filed by the appellant-defendant against the respondent-plaintiff from a judgment of the Assistant Judge Rajkot District at Gondal.

( 2 ) THE appellant is the divorced wife of the respondent. There was one issue of the marriage between the respondent and appellant by name Mohammed Amin. In the year 1955 proceedings were started by the appellant for the maintenance of the minor Mohammed Amin. On July 3 1958 at an appellate stage in these proceedings an agreement was arrived at between the appellant and the respondent. Since a number of points arising in this second appeal revolve round this agreement it is necessary to refer to the terms of this agreement in some detail. This agreement is in the Gujarati language. This agreement is in the form of a writing addressed by the respondent to the appellant and the recital mentions that the terms of the agreement arrived at between the appellant and the respondent in settlement are as set out in the agreement. Clauses I to 4 of this agreement are as follows:- these relevant terms rendered into English would read as follows:- (1) Yo
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top