SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Guj) 68

J.M.SHELAT, A.R.BAKSHI
CHANDULAL JETHALAL JAYASWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.M.THAKAR, S.J.SORABJEE

J. M. SHELAT, J.

( 1 ) THESE two petitions challenge the validity of secs. 2 (10a) 59 and 595 of the Bombay Prohibition Act XXV of 1949 certain rules made thereunder the two notifications issued by the Government of Gujarat dated April 6 1962 and the order dated September 26 1962 refusing the wholesalers licence and the pass to import French Polish and Varnish from outside the State of Gujarat. As both the petitions raise identical questions it is expedient to dispose of both of them together by a common judgment

( 2 ) BOTH the petitioners carry on business as wholesale dealers in French Polish and Varnish and have been importing for their business these two articles from States such as the Uttar Pradesh Madhya Pradesh etc. The petitioners in Special Civil Application No. 996 of 1962 have been importing on an average about 1500 gallons of French Polish per month and have been selling the same both wholesale and retail the average monthly sale of French Polish coming to about 1500 gallons per month.

( 3 ) PRIOR to June 1 1962 there were no restrictions on the import export transport possession use consumption and sale of these articles in the State of Gujarat but as these articles are














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top