SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Guj) 31

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :M.U.SHAH, J.M.SHELAT
MOHAMADMIYA KASAMMIYA - Appellant
Versus
INDUSTRIAL COURT,gujarat - Respondent
S.C.A. 1023 of 1960
Decided On : 03/17/1964

Advocates Appeared: G.P.Vyas, MUKESH R.PATEL, P.B.PATVARI

Headnote:

Industrial Relations Act 1946 – SectionS 116 (2), 66, 44, 46 – Bombay Act 74 of 1948 – Industrial Dispute – Employee Allowances Issue – The two petitioners reaches in the second respondent company alleged that prior to November 1 1958 they had been working in the first shift that they had been assigned work in the second shift as from November 1 1958 that they had not been given the benefit of the change-over by rotation in accordance with the aforesaid award and that contrary to the said award they had been permanently assigned work in the second shift – Held, It was in such a case of complete working of three shifts that change-over directed in the award was to be applied – These words would not have found their place in that order of clarification if the Industrial Court had intended that the change-over was to be effected even if 8 shift did not work fully – That being the position the Industrial Court was right in holding that the said award did not confer absolutely the right of change-over to workmen working in a particular shift irrespective of whether such a shift worked fully or not –It is thus not possible for us to accede to either of the two contentions urged before us on behalf of the petitioners – Petition Dismissed

M. U. SHAH, J. M. SHELAT, J.

( 1 ) THE two petitioners have been working in the Drawing in Department of the second respondent company as reaches in the second shift and have filed this petition challenging the order passed by the Third Labour Court in Application No. 234 of 1959 dated December 1 1959 and confirmed by the Industrial Court by its order in Appeal (IC.) No. 11 of 1960 dated July 28 1960

( 2 ) PRIOR to 1947. there was no system of changeover in the different shifts in the textile mills in Ahmedabad. In 1946 however a Submission bearing No. 6 of 1946 between the Ahmedabad Mill owners Association Ahmedabad and The Textile Labour Association. Ahmedabad was made before the Industrial Court at Bombay wherein the Industrial Court by an interim award passed inter alia and the following order:-- we therefore hold that mills should be allowed to work three shifts if they want to with a system of changeover. Ordinarily the period of the three shifts should be as follows- 1 Shift. . . . . . . . . 7 a. m. to3 p. m. 2 Shift. . . . . . . . . 3 p. m. to 11 p. m. 3 Shift. . . . . . . . . 11 p. m. to7 a. m. There should be a recess of half an hour during each of the three shifts. In winter the work may begin at 1-30 a m. instead of 7 with consequent changes in the other shifts. This will be for a period of one year from the 15th of February 1947 at the end of which this matter will be placed again for hearing as to whether the system should be continued or not In the case of mills working two shifts the working period should be as follows:-- 1 7 a. m. to 3-30 p. m. and With half an hours 2 3 p. m. to 12 mid-night. recess in each shift. In both cases of two shifts as well as three shifts working there will be a system of changeover at the end of each month by which the workers of the first shift will go over to the second and those of the second to the third and those of the third to the first in rotation. If the case of the two Shifts working the day shift and the night shift workers will change in rotation at the end of every month. Thereafter the Ahmedabad Mill owners Association made an application being Application No. 29 of 1947 under rule 64 of the Bombay Industrial Disputes Rules for the interpretation and clarification of the award made on February 7 1947 in the said Submission No. 9 of 9946 and the clarification that was asked for was as to whether that part of the award pertaining to change-over in the three shifts applied to the mills which worked the third shift partially on some of the machines in a department. In clarification of its award the Industrial Court in its order dated April 30 1947 stated that:-- at the time when that matter ( Submission No. 9 of 1948 ) was argued there were no arguments as to what should take place when the 3rd shift worked partially and the dispute was argued on the basis of three shifts being worked wholly and not partially. It was in such a case of complete working of three shifts that changeover directed in the award was to be applied. The case of partial working of third shift is not covered by the award. The result therefore is this. The change-over in three shifts is to be effected where full number of machines in a department are worked Where the third shift is working partially the change-over is to be effected between the first and the second shifts only. In the case of full working of three shifts the hours of work will be 7 1/2 hours in each shift with half an hour recess. In the case of partial working the hours of work will be 8 8 and 6 1/2 with half an hours recess. But in the latter case the change-over shall be restricted to first two shifts only. Since the award as clarified was only intended to operate for one year another application being Miscellaneous Application No. 2 of 1948 was brought before the Industrial Court. In that Application the Industrial Court in partial modification of the original award dated February 71947 directed that:- -. . . . there shall be a chan











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top