J.B.MEHTA, B.J.DIVAN
VAJSI DEVA MEHR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) PAUSING hero it is important to note that in the instant case F. I. R. Ex. 5 is not a statement giving information regarding the commission of a cognizable offence as contemplated by sec. 154 Criminal Procedure Code. It is well settled law that if the statement has been recorded by the police as contemplated by sec. 154 Criminal Procedure Code that statement cannot be said to be recorded in the course of the investigation of the case and therefore would not be hit by the provisions of sec. 162 Criminal Procedure Code as such a statement is not a statement recorded in the course of investigation. Such statements recorded in accordance with the provisions of sec. 154 are popularly referred to as first information reports. In the instant case what we find is that head constable Abakader received a telephone message at about 1-20 P. M. on February 13 1961 This head constable was in charge of the police station at the time when the telephone message was received and he made entry No. 7 in the police station diary of Porbandar Police Station. Entry No. 7 Ex. 41 shows that driver Hamir rang up from phone No. 99 that one man was assaulted by means of an ax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.