SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Guj) 4

B.J.DIVAN
HARISH KUMAR BAPALAL – Appellant
Versus
CHHANALAL RANCHHODLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.V.Nanavati, S.N.SHELAT

B. J. DIVAN, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this Civil Revision Application is original defendant No. 2. The original plaintiff and original defendants Nos. 1 3 and 4 are the opponents in the Civil Revision Application. The plaintiff filed a summary suit being summary suit No. 55/1963 in the Court of Small Causes at Ahmedabad against the four defendants to recover a sum of Rs. 2000. 00. Thereafter a summons for judgment appears to have been taken out and on February 10 1964 the learned Judge of the Court of Small Causes passed an order granting conditional leave to defend to defendant No. 2 the present petitioner. The condition was that the second defendant should deposit the amount claimed in the suit within two weeks; and on such deposit being made the defendant was granted leave to defend. The present Civil Revision Application was filed on March 4 1964 against this conditional order passed by the learned Judge in the Court of Small Causes at Ahmedabad.

( 2 ) AFTER the Civil Revision Application was filed on March 5 1964 it was admitted and a rule returnable on March 30 1964 was directed to be issued. An ad interim stay in terms of para 4 (b) of the petition was also granted on March














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top