SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Guj) 83

N.M.MIABHOY, M.U.SHAH
MOTISING CHHAGUSING VAGHELA – Appellant
Versus
S. D. MEHTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.R.SOMPURA, MAGANBHAI R.BAROT

N. M. MIABHOY, M. U. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER Motising Chhagusing Vaghela has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. There is no dispute that at all the relevant times petitioner was an unarmed Police Head Constable and as such an employee of the former Bombay State The original respondent was Shri C. M. Thaker who was District Superin- tendent of Police Mehsana. There is no dispute that he was at the relevant time the officer competent to dismiss petitioner from service The present respondent Shri S. D. Mehta is the successor-in-office of the original respondent Shri C. M. Thaker. It will be convenient to mention the facts leading up to the present petition at first. On 16th April 1959 petitioner was serving at Patan Police Station District Mehsana. On that day he was suspended by the original respondent on the ground that he was involved in a corruption case. Subsequently petitioner was prosecuted in Special Case No. 3 of 1959 before the learned Special Judge Mehsana on the allegation that on or about 25th January 1959 petitioner had accepted a bribe of Rs. 90. 00 from one Shanker Parshottam of village Borsan as motive or reward for showing favour to











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top