SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Guj) 29

P.N.BHAGWATI, M.U.SHAH
MOHAN MULJI – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BROACH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.DESAI, S.B.MAJMUDAR

P. N. BHAGWATI, M. U. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS group of appeals raises a short question in regard to payment of Court-fee on an application for a Reference made to the Collector under sec. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The facts giving rise to the appeals are identical and it would therefore be sufficient if we state the facts relating to First Appeal No. 163 of 1965. The appellant in this appeal is admittedly a member of a tribe deemed to be a scheduled tribe in relation to the State of Gujarat under Article 342 of the Constitution of India. It appears that certain land belonging to the appellant was acquired by the State of Gujarat under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and an inquiry was held by the Special Land Acquisition Officer for the purpose of determining the amount of compensation payable to the appellant in respect of such acquisition. The Special Land Acquisition Officer made an award dated 2nd March 1963 awarding a sum of Rs. 1378-27 np. As and by way of compensation to the appellant but the appellant was dissatisfied with the award and he therefore made an application to the Special Land Acquisition Officer on 17th May 1963 for a reference under sec. 18 of the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top