SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Guj) 105

N.K.VAKIL, N.M.MIABHOY
MOHMADSHARIF HAKIMJI CHHIPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.H.KAJI, S.G.REBELLO

N. M. MIABHOY, N. K. VAKIL, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition arises out of land acquisition proceedings acquiring lands and structures thereon falling within the line of alignment for the Municipal Corporation of Ahmedabad in Jamalpur area of Ahmedabad City. The sixteen petitioners claim to be the tenants of structures consisting of small shops and rooms. They are petty traders and artisans. Their case as put forward in the petition is that for the first time they came to know about the fact that the premises were being acquired under the Land Acquisition Act when they received notices dated the 3rd of June 1961 from the Taluka Magistrate under sec. 47 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter called (the Act) calling upon them to surrender possession on the 30th of June 1961. It is alleged inter alia that they then came to know that without publishing the necessary notifications under secs. 4 and 6 of the Act in the locality or affixing them on the premises the Land Acquisition Officer had passed and filed an award in respect of these premises on the 3rd of April 1961. No notices were served on them under sec. 9 or sec. 10 before making the said award though they were the occupiers and a














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top