SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Guj) 58

N.M.MIABHOY, J.B.MEHTA
S. M. THAKKAR – Appellant
Versus
M. A. BAQUI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: N.S.PARGHI

J. B. MEHTA, N. M. MIABHOY, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition raises an important question relating to Court deposits but unfortunately having regard to the facts of the case it is not possible for us to decide that point finally so as to be of any help either to petitioner or to Court depositors in general.

( 2 ) THE facts leading up to the presentation of the petition are as follows:- Petitioner entered into a contract for sale of an immovable property with two persons named (1) Mrs. Dhanbai Lallubhai and (2) Suleman Lallubhai and paid Rs. 900/by way of earnest money. Subsequently she filed Special Suit No. 5 of 1963 in the Court of the learned Civil Judge Senior Division Baroda for specific performance of that contract. At that time she paid a sum of Rs. 19 100 in cash by way of deposit to be credited to the above cause. The suit was ultimately compromised on 16th January 1965 by which the purchase price was fixed at Rs. 47 0 Petitioner having already paid Rs. 900/and deposited Rs. 19 100 in Court deposited a further amount of Rs. 27 0 on 17th May 1965 towards the above cause thus completing the sale price of Rs. 47 0 From out of the amount so lying in deposit defendants of the above specia




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top