P.N.BHAGWATI, A.R.BAKSHI
SHAH PRABHUDAS ISHWARDAS – Appellant
Versus
SHAH BHOGILAL NATHALAL CO-PARCENERS OF A JOINT HINDU FAMILY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision application arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants to recover a sum of Rs. 3 600 being the amount of three instalments due and payable by the defendants to the plaintiffs under a document Exhibit 4/1 executed by defendants Nos. 1 and 2 in favour of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs also relied on another document Exhibit 4/2 in support of this claim though the claim was rested primarily on the document Exhibit 4/1. The defendants amongst various defences raised by them in the written statement urged that the documents Exhibits 4/1 and 4/2 were promissory notes and since they were inadequately stamped they were not admissible in evidence. One of the issues framed by the trial Court namely issue No. 3 therefore raised the question whether the documents Exhibits 4/1 land 4/2 were promissory notes and hence inadmissible in evidence. At the trial of the suit when the plaintiffs partner Chimanlal Jagjivandas was in the witness-box and was being examined in chief the documents Exhibits 4/1 and 4/2 were sought to be tendered in evidence and an objection was therefore raised on behalf of the defendants against the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.