SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Guj) 48

P.N.BHAGWATI, A.R.BAKSHI
SHAH PRABHUDAS ISHWARDAS – Appellant
Versus
SHAH BHOGILAL NATHALAL CO-PARCENERS OF A JOINT HINDU FAMILY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.M.PARIKH, M.C.SHAH

A. R. BAKSHI, P. N. BHAGWATI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision application arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants to recover a sum of Rs. 3 600 being the amount of three instalments due and payable by the defendants to the plaintiffs under a document Exhibit 4/1 executed by defendants Nos. 1 and 2 in favour of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs also relied on another document Exhibit 4/2 in support of this claim though the claim was rested primarily on the document Exhibit 4/1. The defendants amongst various defences raised by them in the written statement urged that the documents Exhibits 4/1 and 4/2 were promissory notes and since they were inadequately stamped they were not admissible in evidence. One of the issues framed by the trial Court namely issue No. 3 therefore raised the question whether the documents Exhibits 4/1 land 4/2 were promissory notes and hence inadmissible in evidence. At the trial of the suit when the plaintiffs partner Chimanlal Jagjivandas was in the witness-box and was being examined in chief the documents Exhibits 4/1 and 4/2 were sought to be tendered in evidence and an objection was therefore raised on behalf of the defendants against the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top