SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Guj) 3

B.G.THAKOR, A.D.DESAI
KOLI TRIKAM JIVRAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.T.NANAVATI, K.J.SETHNA

A. D. DESAI, J.

( 1 ) IN sessions Case No. 3 of 1966 Shri D. A. Desai Sessions Judge Bhavnagar convicted the appellants for having committed an offence punishable under secs. 394 326 read with sec. 34 and sec. 324 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them for an offence under sec. 394 of the Indian Penal Code to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years No order of sentence was passed in respect of offences punishable under sec. 326 read with sec. 34 and sec. 324 of the Indian Penal Code

( 2 ) THE prosecution case was that one Bhikha Sukha was a resident of village Khakhoi Taluka Botad District Bhavnagar. Bhikha Sukha had purchased vadi land bearing S. No. 60 admeasuring 75 bighas and situated in the said village. Bhikha Sukha has no child. He has a sister who was married to one Premji Prag who originally resided in village Ugamedi. Premji has four sons. After Bhikha Sukha had purchased the vadi land he brought his brother-in-law Premji Prag and his four sons to village Khakhoi and they settled in the said village. Dharamshi and Talshi 2 elder sons of Premji were cultivating this vadi land. In the cultivating season of 1964-65 Premji Prag and his sons had raised Juwar Sugar cane chi

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top