SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Guj) 29

N.G.SHELAT
BABUSING JODHANSING JAMADAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.H.THAKAR, DAULAT C.TRIVEDI

N. G. SHELAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of an order passed on 26-9-67 by Mr. B. N. Doctor City Magistrate 10 Court Ahmedabad in Summary Case No. 50 of 1965 whereby the appellant accused came to be convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven days and to pay a fine of Rs. 100. 00 or in default to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for ten days for an offence under sec. 332 read with sec. 24 of the Indian Penal Code. tie is further convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 100. 00 or in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten days for an offence under sec. 323 read with sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In respect of the other offences for which he came to be charged he has been acquitted.

( 2 ) ONE Shri Kantilal Bapalal Mody an advocate and a receiver appointed by the City Civil Court in Civil Suit No. 806 of 1968 filed a complaint Ex. 1 against the accused-appellant in respect of offences punishable under secs. 323 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code of the City Magistrate 10 Court Ahmedabad. The process was directed to be issued against the accused in respect of offences under secs. 504 and 506 Part I of the Indian Penal Code. Since the offe








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top