SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Guj) 81

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :P.N.BHAGWATI, N.K.VAKIL
ASHOKKUMAR GORDHANBHAI - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
S.C.A. 903 of 1964
Decided On : 07/31/1968

Advocates Appeared: J.M.THAKAR, S.B.VAKIL

Headnote:

Land Acquisition Act – Sections 4, 5, 6 –Gujarat Industrial Development Act 1962 – Sections 13, 32 – Land Acquisition – Industrial Purposes – Special Civil Applications belong to a group of 21 petitions which arise out of sand acquisition Proceedings taken by State at various Places after declaring that the respective lands are needed to be acquired at the public expense for the purpose generally speaking for establishing industrial township or estate for heavy and medium or light industries – Held, It lays bare a pre-existing scheme of acquisition made at the instance of the Corporation and an arrangement between the Corporation and the Government which is inextricably linked with the scheme that the money will be provided by the Government for meeting the cost of acquisition but it will be treated as a loan to the Corporation recoverable with interest – Under the circumstances the Issuance of notifications under sec. 6 of the Act in implementation of the said scheme declaring that the lands are required for public purpose at public expense. is colourable exercise of power – Petitions Allowed

N. K. VAKIL, J.

( 1 ) THESE Special Civil Applications belong to a group of 21 petitions which arise out of sand acquisition Proceedings taken by the State at various Places after declaring that the respective lands are needed to be acquired at the public expense for the purpose generally speaking for establishing industrial township or estate for heavy and medium or light industries. As some common on questions of law and even to some extent of facts arise we have heard all these petitions together. All the same we have thought it expedient not to dispose them of by a single judgment. But out of these seven petitions refer to lands at Karamsad in Anand Taluka which are sought to be acquired by the same notifications under secs. 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act thereafter referred to as the Act) and therefore it will be convenient to dispose them of together by this judgment. We shall also dispose of Special civil Applications No. 43 of 1965 and 1023 of 1967 wherein the lands concerned are of village Odhav City Taluka Ahmedabad by this judgment because the contentions raised therein are mostly the same as in the petitions relating to lands at Karamsad. We will be stating necessary relative facts of all these petitions and will also deal with special points if any raised in the respective petitions over and above the common points.

( 2 ) IN Special Civil Application No. 903 of 1964 the petitioner and the third respondent are owners of land bearing S. No 778 of village Karamsad admeasuring about 3 Acres 5 Gunthas. They had purchased the land on 27th July 1960 with a view to construct a factory thereon for curing tobacco. An application was made by them on August 17 1962 for permission to use the land for non-agricultural purposes. However the Government of Gujarat in the meantime issued a notification dated 27 August 1962 under sec. 4 of the Act which was published in the Gujarat Government Gazette Part I Supplement dated September 20 1962 By the said notification it was notified that the said land was likely to be needed for the purpose of the Charotar Gramodhdhar Sahakari Mandali Ltd. On the 19th of November 1962 the Prant Officer refused the permission to the petitioners to put land under non-agricultural use in view of the above notification under sec. 4 of the Act. Thereafter the Government issued a notification dated 26th July 1963 published on the 1st August 1963 whereby the prior notification was cancelled. On the 26th of July 1963 Government issued another notification under sec. 4 of the Act notifying that the said land inter a was likely to be needed for the public purpose Viz. for establishing industrial township for heavy and light industries. After the objections were filed and heard the Government issued a notification under sec. 6 of the Act which was published on 29th October 1964 stating inter alia that the Government of Gujarat was satisfied after considering the report of the Collector under sub-sec. (2) of sec. 5a of the said Act that the said lands were needed to be acquired at the public expense for public purpose viz for establishing industrial township for heavy and light industries and declaring under the provisions of sec. 6 of the Act that the said lands were needed for a public purpose or for a company as specified in column 4 of the schedule to the said notification By the said notification urgency clause was also applied. There are further averments of facts in the petition but we need not state them here as they have not any bearing on the points raised before us at the hearing for our consideration. But a set of facts which need be noted as they have a bearing on the controversy between the parties is that before sec. 6 notification was issued Government had published two important resolutions declaring its general policy in respect of the acquisitions made for the purpose of establishing the industrial township for heavy and light or medium industries. The first is dated 30th June 1964 copy wh


















































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top