Gujarat High Court
Judgename :B.R.SOMPURA, N.G.SHELAT
COLLECTOR - Appellant
Versus
HARIDAS MAGANLAL PARIKH - Respondent
First Appeal 30 of 1964
Decided On : 07/26/1968
Land Acquisition Act – Sections 4, 23, 18 – Land belonging to respondents came to be acquired by Government for purpose of construction of houses for members of staff of Electricity Board at Baroda at pursuance of a Notification issued under sec. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act – Owners of that land claimed Rs. 98 10 by way of compensation under sec. 23 of Act before Special Land Acquisition Officer who awarded in all Rs. 9 995 np. inclusive of solatium at the rate of 15% on the amount of compensation – It was valued at rate of Rs. 4800. 00 per one acre of land – Feeling dissatisfied with that award a reference was made under sec. 18 of the Act by the Land Acquisition Officer at their instance in the Court of the District Judge at Baroda – Claim made therein was at the rate of 10 annas per one square foot of land – That claim together with other Claims made by them came to be allowed by the Joint Civil Judge (S. D.) who heard the reference – Opponents were thereby directed to pay Rs. 48 655 np. and the costs of the reference to the claimants with interest at 4 per cent on the above amount from the date of possession to that of payment – Feeling dissatisfied with that order passed by Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division) the opponents have come in appeal before this Court – Held, In court’s view therefore since it was in respect of same land under acquisition and it took place only three months before the date of the notification issued under sec. 4 of the Act for acquisition of that land it can serve as a very good piece of evidence for determining the market price of the land under acquisition price cannot be taken in any way less having regard to the period fixed for the reason that the property remained with the vendors during that period – Amount of Rs. 2000. 00 as deposit cannot also be said to be far less for much depended upon the lands being turned into non-agricultural use and again required to be permitted by the Revenue and Town Planning Authorities. Court is satisfied that the market value of the land as it stood as on the date when the notification was published under sec. 4 was as given in the agreement of sale – That has been accepted by Judge below and court agree with him – In view that we have taken in agreement with the learned trial Judge it is unnecessary to go into other instances of sale ant evidence in the case – In the result therefore the order passed by the learned Civil Judge is proper and calls for no interference whatsoever – Appeal Dismissed
( 1 ) THE land bearing S. No. 70 admeasuring 3 vighas-1 vasa (1 acre-32 gunthas) situated in the limits of the village of Jetalpur in Baroda Taluka belonging to the respondents came to be acquired by the Government for the purpose of construction of houses for the members of the staff of the Electricity Board at Baroda at pursuance of a Notification issued on 11-4-60 under sec. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act hereinafter to be referred to as the Act. Jetalpur village adjoins the Alkapuri area of Baroda City. The owners of that land claimed Rs. 98 10 by way of compensation under sec. 23 of the Act before the Special Land Acquisition Officer who awarded in all Rs. 9 995 np. inclusive of solatium at the rate of 15% on the amount of compensation It was valued at the rate of Rs. 4800. 00 per one acre of land. Feeling dissatisfied with that award a reference was made under sec. 18 of the Act by the Land Acquisition Officer at their instance in the Court of the District Judge at Baroda. The claim made therein was at the rate of 10 annas per one square foot of land i. e. at the rate of Rs. 27 225 per one acre of land. That claim together with other Claims made by them came to be allowed by the Joint Civil Judge (S. D.) Baroda who heard the reference. The opponents were thereby directed to pay Rs. 48 655 np. and the costs of the reference to the claimants with interest at 4 per cent on the above amount from the date of possession to that of payment. Feeling dissatisfied with that order passed on 25th February 1963 by Mr. N. J. Patel Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division) Baroda the opponents have come In appeal before this Court.
( 2 ) THE map Ex. 44 shows the situation of S. No. 70 as also other survey numbers situated in the Race Course Circle and round about the same. This S. No. 70 is situated in the Race Course Circle and that Race Course Circle is outside the municipal limits of Baroda though no doubt it adjoins the municipal limits. In other words the circular Race Course Road is the end of the municipal limits of Baroda. It further appears that a road coming from the Baroda Railway Station joins the Race Course Road at a point opposite to S. Nos. 70 and 74. S. No. 74 belongs to Government and the passage for S. No. 70 appears to be passing through that land for going on to the road to the east. It appears further clear from the evidence on record that at the time of the acquisition of the land there were existing various societies such as Alkapuri Co-operative Housing Society Milan Co-operative Housing Society Gautamnagar Housing Society and Sarabhai Co-operative Housing Society round about and in the vicinity of that area. At a distance of about 100 feet from the land under acquisition there was the State Transport Workshop. Sarabhai Chemical Works as the evidence discloses is at a distance of about a furlong or so from the land under acquisition. There were some other factories though no doubt at some distance from the acquired land in that area. The land under acquisition was an agricultural land and it was not converted for non-agricultural use so far While the area within the municipal limits had must developed this part of the area where the land under acquisition is situated though not developed so must it can be said to be having a building potentiality for the reason that it was situated in a fairly good and developed area.
( 3 ) THE claimants based the claim for compensation for the land under acquisition on two grounds. The first was on the basis of the said land agreed to be purchased by some persons on behalf of Vijaynagar Co-operative Housing Society for a sum of Rs. 51 1 under an agreement of sale at Ex. 41 dated 2nd January 1960. According to the claimants that was the best piece of evidence-it being In respect of the same land and by about the same time when the notification under sec. 4 came to be issued for the acquisition of that land. They also relied upon certain instances of sale having taken p
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.