SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Guj) 108

J.B.MEHTA
MAHMADHUSSEIN KURBANHUSEIN MITHIBORWALA – Appellant
Versus
ONALI FIDAALI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.N.SURATI, B.R.SHELAT

J. B. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who was the original opponent No. 1 to the election petition has challenged the order of the Election Tribunal viz. the Assistant Judge Panchmahals dated 22nd March 1968 dismissing the petitioners application to treat the list of the voters as conclusive evidence under sec. 10 (3) of the Gujarat Municipalities Act 1963 hereinafter referred to as the Act and to desist from further inquiry by recording evidence as regards the age of the twenty-four voters who have been alleged to be below 21 years of age and were therefore alleged to be not qualified to be included in the voters list.

( 2 ) SEC. 9 (1) provides for the list of voters. It enacts that the electoral roll of the Gujarat Assembly prepared under the provisions of the Representation of the People Act 1950 for the time being in force on such date as the State Government may by general or special order notify in this behalf for such part of the constituency of the Assembly as it included in the relevant ward of a municipal borough shall for the purposes of this Act be deemed to be the list for such ward.

( 3 ) SEC. 9 (2) provides for its publication. Sec. 9 (3) lays-down that if on an applic

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top