SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Guj) 22

M.U.SHAH, N.G.SHELAT
GAUTAMLAL NARANLAL – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,ahmedabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.M.THAKAR, MAHESH C.BHATT, V.S.PARIKH

M. U. SHAH, N. G. SHELAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS group of eight revision applications raise a common question as to whether the Gujarat Housing Board established under the Gujarat Housing Board Act 1961 which is said to be a local authority contemplated in sec. 3 sub-sec. (3) of the said Act becomes a necessary or proper party so called under the provisions contained in O. I of the Civil Procedure Code by reason of their being directed to appear and adduce evidence if any under sec. 50 sub-sec. (2) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 hereinafter to be referred to as the Act as amended by Act XX of 1963 by the Gujarat State in the land acquisition proceedings taken out by the Local Government for the benefit of the Housing Board. In the event of our finding that the Gujarat Housing Board is not a party either necessary or proper in the proceedings under the Act we are required to consider as to the meaning given to the words to appear and adduce evidence if any so as to include the right of audience as also to cross examine the claimants witnesses etc. in the matter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

( 2 ) THE Gujarat Housing Board is constituted under the provisions contained in Gujarat

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top