SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Guj) 92

D.A.DESAI, J.B.MEHTA
DALLUMIYA LALMIYA MALEK – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AKSHAY H.MEHTA, N.C.SHAH, NAGARDAS K.SHAH

J. B. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two Letters Patent Appeals raise certain common questions of law and therefore they are disposed of by this common order. The two important questions of law which arise in there two appeals are:- (1) As regards the forum for appeal in the inquiry under sec. 37 (2) of the Bombay Land Revenue Code 1879 hereinafter referred to as the Code and the remedies which have to be exhausted before filing a suit in this connection as well as the nature of the suit which can be filed and (2) As regards the applicability of presumption under sec. 110 of the Evidence Act in such cases where a claim is sought to be decided under sec. 37 (2) of the Code. In Letters Patent Appeal No. 21 of 1966 the question is regarding the suit land marked A B C D E which is said to belong to the plaintiffs Muslim Masjid as wakf property. The two managers of the said wakf have filed the present suit. The plaintiffs claim that formerly there were houses on the suit land and a portion thereof was used as a Vada. In 1878 A. D. by an arrangement as per Ex. 40 the leading Muslims of Undhela kept Fakir Kalusha and others for looking after the wakf property and the Fakir was allowed to occupy the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top