B.J.DIVAN, P.N.BHAGWATI, T.U.MEHTA
VRAJLAL MAKANDAS VALIYA – Appellant
Versus
L. D. JOSHI, COLLECTOR, DIST. BHAVNAGAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a reference made to us by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority under sec. 54 (1a) of the Bombay Stamp Act 1958 The question which arises for consideration on the reference is as to what is the proper Article of the Act under which a certain instrument executed between the partners of Messrs. Veto Industries is chargeable. To determine the question it is necessary to refer briefly to a few facts giving rise to the reference. Prior to Aso Vad Amas Samvat Year 2021 ten persons carried on business in partnership in the firm name of Messrs. Velo Industries. Three of them retired from the firm with effect from Aso Vad Amas Samvat Year 2021 leaving the other seven as continuing partners of the firm. The terms and conditions of retirement were recorded in an instrument dated 24/10/1963 executed by and between the partners and since the entire controversy between the parties has turned on the true interpretation of this instrument it would be desirable to set out some of its material provisions in extenso. They read according to their English translation:-1 We have retired from the firm of Messrs. Velo industries with effect from Aso Vad Amas Samvat Year 202
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.