SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Guj) 88

T.U.MEHTA
ARUN VAMANRAO SHASTRI – Appellant
Versus
LINA ARUN SHASTRI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AKSHAY H.MEHTA, M.C.SHAH, V.H.BHAIRAVIA

T. U. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THE question which arises to be considered in this revision application is whether a Hindu wife who has obtained a decree for judicial separation under the Hindu Marriage Act (hereafter referred to as the said Act) should proceed only under sec. 25 of the said Act with a view to get maintenance or it is open to her to file a separate suit for obtaining maintenance without pursuing her remedies for the same under the said sec. 25.

( 2 ) THE short facts of the case are that the petitioner of this revision application is married with opponent on 24th January 1964 In the year 1971 the opponent wife filed Hindu Marriage Petition No. 12/71 against the petitioner husband for obtaining a decree for judicial separation. It is an admitted position that this petition was filed on 1st February 1971 and it was disposed of on 15th April 1971 when a decree for judicial separation was passed in favour of the opponent wife. It appears that during the pendency of that petition no orders of maintenance pendente lite were passed by the court under sec. 24 of the Act. It is also an admitted position that neither at the time of passing the said decree of judicial separation nor at a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top