SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Guj) 90

M.U.SHAH
VOHRA BAI KHATIJA ISABHAI – Appellant
Versus
VOHRA KARIMBHAI ISSABHAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.A.MEHTA, H.M.THAKOR, V.V.MEHTA

M. U. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants are the three daughters of a Sunni Hanafi Bohra named Issa Hasan who died on 12th January 1954 in the town of Muli which formed part of the former State of Saurashtra at that time and where the deceased had settled. The deceased had left behind him several agricultural pieces of lands a residential house and certain other property described in Schedule A to the plaint which was instituted on April 14 1965 in the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Muli and the suit was registered as Regular Civil Suit No. 4c of 1965 The plaintiffs claim that they are the daughters of deceased Bohra Issa and are governed by the Hanafi school of Mahomedan Law and are thus entitled collectively to a share as sharers according to Mahomedan Law. The plaintiffs claim that after the demise of their father defendant No. 1 Vohra Karimbhai step brother of the plaintiffs was managing the estate of the deceased. They claimed partition of the suit properties and separate possession as sharers. They also claimed accounts to be taken of the yield of the properties. It was alleged that an agricultural field bearing S. No. 1820 which was left by deceased Vohra Isa was sold











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top