SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Guj) 99

T.U.MEHTA
NATUBHAI GORDHANDAS PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.P.OZA, J.M.THAKAR, P.V.Hathi

T. U. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) AN important question which is involved in this Writ Petition is whether the directions given by the State Government in form of a Resolution to the State Housing Board (which is hereinafter referred to as the Board) for the disposal of some residential flats built for low income group persons are infringing the provisions of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India inasmuch as they resort to a Classification which has no nexus with the proclaimed object of regulations framed for disposal of such flats.

( 2 ) THE petitioner No. 1 is a resident of Ahmedabad and petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 are Government servants at present occupying houses allotted to them in Housing Colonies built by the Board at Ahmedabad within the limits of Paldi area. These colonies are known as H and L colonies and this writ petition is with regard to the flats of these colonies. Respondent No. 1 is the State of Gujarat respondent No. 2 is the Gujarat Housing Board through its Chairman respondent No. 3 is the Housing Commissioner of the Board respondent No. 4 is the Union of India while respondents Nos. 5 to 14 are the persons who are interested in the petition and who are joined as parties as su































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top