D.P.DESAI
JAGMOHAN RATILAL SHETH – Appellant
Versus
JAYANTILAL LAXMISHANKER – Respondent
( 1 ) ONE of the questions raised in this revisional application is quite interesting and it relates to the effect of tendering a few months rent to the landlord by a tenant who is admittedly on the date of the tender in arrears for a period greater than the period covered by the amount tendered when this tender is made before issuance of a notice under sec. 12 (2) of the Bombay Rents Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act 1947 (hereafter referred to as the Act ).
( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY the petitioner was the tenant of the rented premises at a monthly rent of Rs. 50/and the premises were let out possibly according to the Indian calendar month. The rent note in this case came to be executed on June 1 1964 It was made for a period of two months only. However there was holding over by the tenant under the rent note. It cannot be challenged now that this tenant was in arrears from September 1 1967 It appears that the parties regulated the month of rent with reference to Gregorian calendar. The amount of rent in arrears came to Rs. 350/on April 26 1968 Thus it was rent in arrears for seven months. On that day the tenant sent a money order for Rs. 200/which would be sufficien
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.