( 1 ) THIS Revision Application is directed against the order of the City Magistrate 5 Court Ahmedabad rejecting the application given by the present petitioner for supply of copies of relevant documents mentioned therein.

( 2 ) AN application was submitted by Ramniklal Pragjibhai who was the original accused No. 1 on 1-5-1972 with a request that copies of the statement of reasons given by the Hand-writing expert and other relevant documents be supplied to him. The learned City Magistrate rejected the application on the ground that his was an inquiring Court and that Court had only to commit the case. The relevant observations are as under :-THIS is the inquiring Court. This Court has only to commit the case. If the documents asked for are not supplied to the accused they must make a grievance at the Trial Court. This Court will not decide about the relevancy of the documents at this stage. The accused may move the Trial Court after the committal of this case. Being aggrieved with the said order of the City Magistrate the present Revision Application has been preferred.

( 3 ) MR. A. D. Shah the learned advocate for the petitioner urged that in the instant case the lea