SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Guj) 6

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :J.M.SHETH
BHOGILAL HARILAL DAVE - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL 153 of 1971
Decided On : 01/22/1973

Subject

Criminal Law - Obscenity

Act Referred

INDIAN PENAL CODE : S.292

Headnote

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 292 - Criminal Case - Conviction - Appeal is filed by the appellant who has been convicted of an offence punishable and sentenced to suffer three months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine and in default of payment of fine to undergo one month’s simple imprisonment by the learned City Magistrate 7 Court in Criminal Case - Review application has been filed for enhancement of the sentence - Held, It seems to us that the case falls within the first category mentioned by the Privy Council - This is not a case of irregularity but want of competency - Apart from sec. 350 which as we have said is not applicable to the present case the Code does not conceive of such a trial - Trial offends the cardinal principle of law earlier stated the acceptance of which by the Code is clearly manifest from the fact that the Code embodies an exception to that principle in sec. 350 - Therefore we think that sec. 537 of the Code has no application. It cannot be called in aid to make what was incompetent competent - There has been no proper trial of the case and there should be one - In the instant case also Court is concerned with the competency of the Court - Court of City Magistrate was not competent to try this offence - Order of conviction and sentence passed against the appellant therefore cannot be sustained - Appeal allowed

Advocates Appeared: G.A.MEHTA, K.M.CHHAYA, V.B.SHAH

J. M. SHETH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the appellant who has been convicted of an offence punishable under sec. 292 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer three months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/ and in default of payment of fine to undergo one months simple imprisonment by the learned City Magistrate 7 Court Ahmedabad in Criminal Case No. 918 of 1970. Review application has been filed for enhancement of the sentence.

( 2 ) THE appellant was charged in that he in the month of August 1968 printed for sale in the name of Prakash Vardhan a book bearing the title EX SANSKARI GHARNI YUVTINI KHANGI DIARY which is an obscene book. In that it contained the following passages quoted in the sheet attached and thereby committed an offence punishable under sec. 292 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 3 ) MR. G. A. Mehta appearing for the appellant has contended that the appellant was charged for the aforesaid offence having beers committed sometime in the month of August 1968 and he has been tried and convicted by the learned City Magistrate. This sec. 292 of the Indian Penal Code was amended by Amending Act No. 36 of 1969 described as Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act 1969 that came into force on 7th September 190 Sec. 292 of the Indian Penal Code originally stood as under: whoever- (A) sells lets to hire distributes publicly exhibits or in any manner puts into circulation or for purposes of sale hire distribution public exhibition or circulation makes produces or has in his possession any obscene book pamphlet paper drawing paintings representation or figure or any other obscene object whatsoever or (B) imports exports or conveys any obscene object for any of the purposes fore aid or knowing or having reason to believe that such object will be sold let to hire distributed or publicly exhibited or in any manner put into circulation or (C) takes part in or receives profits from any business in the court of which he knows or has reason to believe that any such obscene objects are for any qt. the proposes aforesaid made produced purchased kept imported exported conveyed publicly exhibited or in any manner put into circulation or (D) advertises or makes known by any means whatsoever that any person is engaged or is ready to engage in any act which is an offence under this section or that any such obscene object can be procured from or through any person or (E) offers or attempts to do any act which is an offence under this section shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months or with fine or with both. After the amendment it stood as under:"292 (1) For the purposes of sub-sec. (2) a book pamphlet paper writing drawing painting representation figure or any other object shall be deemed to be obscene if it is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect or (where it comprises two or more distinct items) the effect of any one of its items is if taken as a whole such as to tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are likely having regard to 11 relevant circumstances to read see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it. " (2) Whoever (A) sells lets to hire distributes publicly exhibits or in any manner puts into circulation or for purposes 3f sale hire distribution public exhibition or circulation makes produces or has in his possession any obscene book pamphlet paper drawing painting representation or figure or any other obscene object whatsoever or (B) imports exports or conveys any obscene object for any of the purposes aforesaid or knowing or having reason to believe that such object will be sold let to hire distributed or publicly exhibited or in any manner put into circulation or (C) takes part in or receives profits from any business in the course of which he knows or has reason to believe that any such obscene objects are for any of the purposes aforesaid made produced purchased kept imported exported conveyed publicly exhibited











1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top