SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Guj) 3

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :J.B.MEHTA, S.H.SHETH
HARJI CHAKU - Appellant
Versus
MAMLATDAR,lalpur - Respondent
S.C.A. 1849 of 1971
Decided On : 01/18/1973

Advocates Appeared: DIPAK K.TRIVEDI, M.M.DAVE, RAMESH A.MEHTA

Headnote:

Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 - Section 20 (1) - Group Gram Panchayat - Voting - Electoral award - Petitioner who is a registered voter in the village challenges in this petition the notification issued hereinafter referred to as the Act by the competent authority dividing this Gram into three election wards and distributing three seats to each ward - Held, State Governments relevant circular which is annexed to the affidavit even adopts population basis as the relevant test for fixing various electoral wards because in Para 4 (i) it is provided that seats should be allotted to the electoral divisions on a population basis - In Para 4 (ii) it is provided that no electoral division should ordinarily have more than four seats and less than three seats - Only in exceptional cases an electoral division may have only one or two seats - That is why in the present case this separate ward with some additional weightage of three minimum seats was rightly given to village - Therefore the petitioners attack on the impugned notification on the aforesaid two grounds must obviously fail - In the circumstances it is not necessary to go into the contention of one that without joining the persons affected from village such a petition was not legally competent on which we do not express any opinion - Petition dismissed

J. B. MEHTA, S. H. SHETH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who is a registered voter in the village Khad-Khambhalia challenges in this petition the notification issued on September 27 1971 under sec. 20 (1) of the Gujarat Panchayats Act 1961 hereinafter referred to as the Act by the competent authority dividing this Gram into three election wards and distributing three seats to each ward. The Khad-khambhalia Gram Panchayat originally consisted of four villages Khad-khambhalia Nava Dhunia Khatia and Rakka. From the inception of the Group Gram Panchayat in 1952 election was always uncontested and its 11 seats at that time had been divided as under:- Khad-khambhalia -6 Khatia -2 Nava Dhunia -1 Rakka -2 thus as against 6 seats for Khad-khambhalia Nava Dhunia had only one seat for all these 18 to 20 years. The old Gram Panchayat had passed unanimous resolution to have separate Panchayats for all the four villages. However the State Government under sec. 9 of the Act gave separate Panchayats by constituting only Khatia and Rakka as new Grams while Nava Dhunia still remained joint with Khad-khambhalia. Nava Dhunia therefore did not get independent Panchayat and it was therefore given at the time of constituting these election wards a separate ward. The new Gram was divided into three election wards of which 6 seats in the first-two wards were given under the impugned notification to the village Khad-khambhalia while the remaining three seats were given to Nava Dhunia which was constituted into a separate ward. In each ward there was a reserved seat. There was one reserved seat for women and one was scheduled caste seat in the two wards in Khad-khambhalia while the remaining woman seat was reserved in the ward of Nava Dhunia village. As regards the voters strength the population of the village Khadkhambhalia of 1139 souls was divided into first and second ward respectively with 324 and 267 voters; while the population of 241 souls of Nava Dhunia was given ward No. 3 with its 145 voters. The petitioner therefore challenges this impugned notification on the ground that it hits the rocognised principle of one person one vote and thereby denies equal voting power to the Khad-khambhalia voters by giving almost double weightage to these voters of Nava Dhunia village. The petitioner has not only challenged the notification but he challenges even sec. 20 (1) itself on the ground that it confers arbitrary and unguided power and that there is no provision for giving any opportunity of hearing and that therefore it is ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution. The Taluka Development Officer has in his affidavit pointed out that a meeting of the village people of both the villages was called on July 8 1971 where the representatives mentioned therein who were the leaders of the two respective villages had after due consideration decided upon the formation of three wards after considering the population figures as per the relevant Census report. These wards were thus agreed upon after detailed discussion in the presence of the respective leaders of the villages and even one seat which was reserved in each ward was agreed upon. A report to that effect was submitted on August 4 1971 by the Taluka Panchayat to the District Collector stating that looking to the social and economic backwardness of the village Nava Dhunia separate ward should be given to that village. It was also stated in the report that distance from Nava Dhunia to Khad-khambhalia was more than 4 miles and that fact should be borne in mind. It was also pointed out that since establishment of the Panchayati Raj village Nava Dhunia was under joint Panchayat and that there was no voice of that village as the entire administration was carried out by Khad-khambhalia which was in majority. The two villages were already separate viz. Khatia and Rakka and on getting independent Panchayat they had now got minimum 9 seats each whereas this village Nava Dhunia was getting only two seats on account of the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top