SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Guj) 93

M.C.TRIVEDI, M.P.THAKKAR
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
DASHRATHLAL FAKIRBHAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.B.SHAH, V.S.PARIKH

M. C. TRIVEDI, M. P. THAKKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS judgment will dispose of two cross appeals arising out of the judgment rendered by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ahmedabad (Rural) at Narol in jurisdiction civil suit No. 52 of 1967 on 30th November 1967. The two appeals are First Appeal No. 1062 of 1968 by the State and the Special Land Acquisition Officer who were original defendants and First Appeal No. 1063 of 1968 by the original plaintiff. Both the sides have filed the appeals because the Trial Court has decreed the suit partly and both the sides feel aggrieved to the extent they have failed.

( 2 ) THE main controversy in the suit centres around the validity of the notification under sec. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) issued by the competent authority for the purpose of acquiring the land belonging to the plaintiff admeasuring 5 acres and 39 gunthas comprised in S. No. 9 of village Dani Limda situated beyond the limits of the Municipal Corporation of Ahmedabad on December 19 1957 The urgency clause under sec. 17 (4) of the Act was applied and inquiry under sec. 5 (A) of the Act was dispensed with. The said notification under sec. 4 was








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top