SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Guj) 31

D.P.DESAI, B.J.DIVAN, A.D.DESAI
MEMON ADAMBHAI HAJI ISMAIL – Appellant
Versus
BHAIYA RAMDAS BADIUDAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.K.AMIN, DIPAK K.TRIVEDI, N.Y.PATHAN

A. D. DESAI, B. J. DIVAN, D. P. DESAI, J.

( 1 ) RELEVANT facts to state briefly are that the petitioner is the landlord of the first opponent in respect of a residential premises. The petitioner gave a notice dated March 1 1965 through his lawyer to the said opponent of eviction and demanding arrears of rent by registered post with an acknowledgment due. The envelope in which the notice demanding possession and arrears of rent was sent is produced in the suit subsequently filed by the petitioner against the opponents to recover possession and arrears of rent. The possession of the suit premises was sought on various grounds including that of arrears of rent. The envelope produced in the case shows that there is an endorsement of not found which is dated March 3 1965 There is another endorsement of refused dated March 5 1965 On the other side of the envelop there are two cross lines across the name of the addressee tenant and between these two cross lines endorsement refused is noted which bears the date of March 4 1965 The envelope with the endorsements thereon is exhibited in the case and bears Ex. 43. The tenant had also filed an application for fixation of standard rent in respec











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top