B.K.MEHTA, J.B.MEHTA
JOSHI INDULAL VALLABRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner herein on behalf of himself and 28 other share-holders similarly situated like him has filed this petition in representative capacity under Order I Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code challenging the coercive recovery proceedings initiated by respondent No. 4 herein who is Additional Special Recovery Officer Co-operative Societies of Mehsana district at the instance of respondent No. 3 who happens to be Liquidator of the society known as Kheralu Taluka Utpan Kharid Vechan Sangh Limited for recovery of contributions remaining unpaid by the petitioner and other share-holders represented by him since they happen to be share-holders of the aforesaid society.
( 2 ) IN order to appreciate the contentions which have been urged by Miss V. P. Shah the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner a few facts need be stated.
( 3 ) THE aforesaid society was registered under the Sahakari Mandali Nibandh (a law pertaining to Co operative Societies) as was in force In the erstwhile State of Baroda on October 6 1947 The said society was registered as a society limited by guarantee and according to Clause 6 of the Bye-laws of the said societ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.