SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Guj) 28

M.P.THAKKAR
INAYATKHAN MOHMED AJAN KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.H.THAKAR, A.M.PIRZADA, F.DABHI

M. P. THAKKAR, J.

( 1 ) THE focus of disputation in the present appeal is section 70 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act 1950 (Trust Act ). Is it retrospective in operation in the sense that it can be invoked to rectify errors committed even prior to the enforcement of the said Section in 1954 as contented by the respondent State ? Or is it prospective in the Sense that it can be invoked only to rectify errors committed subsequent to its introduction as canvassed by the appellant ?

( 2 ) BEFORE we tune in to the main question a Swift glance at the facts is called for On May 15 1952 one Fejmohmad made an application praying that land comprised in S. No. 156 should be declared as public trust property and that it should be registered as Rajbai Takia Kabrastan inasmuch as the said land was assigned to the Muslim community of Palanpur by the then Nawab of Palanpur for use as a grave-yard. The application was registered as Inquiry No. 1209 of 1952. Within five months the application Was granted and an order Was passed on October 13 1952 registering it as a public trust and declaring that the land belonged to the said public trust. It appears that some time in or about 1966-67 it was realised








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top