SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Guj) 67

S.H.SHETH
RAJ MADHAVSANG GULABSANG – Appellant
Versus
PARMAR RANCHHODBHAI GALABSANG – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: KURESHI HAMID, M.B.SHAH

S. H. SHETH, J.

( 1 ) THE respondents who claim to be the tenants in respect of S. No. 1194 admeasuring 5 acres 39 gunthas of village Anklav in Borsad Taluka of Kaira District filed the present suit under sec. 29 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1948 (hereinafter re- ferred to as the Tenancy Act for the sake of brevity) against the petitioner (original landlord) for recovering possession of that land. The Mamlatdar who heard the application decided on merits and held that the land consisted of two parts one of which had been under mortgage with the tenants and another had not been under any such mortgage with them. In respect of the land under mortgage he held that prior to the mortgage the tenants had been cultivating the land lawfully and had therefore been its tenants. He therefore applied sec. 25a of the Tenancy Act and made an order for possession of the land under mortgage in favour of the tenants. He dismissed the rest of the claim made by the tenants because according to him they had not proved that they were or have been the tenants in respect of that part of the land.

( 2 ) BOTH the parties appealed against that order to the Collector. The Deputy Collector








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top