SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Guj) 32

M.P.THAKKAR
SOMABHAI CHATURBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.K.TAKVANI, D.G.KARIA, R.K.ABICHANDANI

M. P. THAKKAR, J.

( 1 ) CONSIDERATIONS which must be kept on the mental screen and precautions which may be taken in disposing of an application for anticipatory bail under sec. 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 require to be spelled out in order that the provision is meaningfully applied and judicial discretion is exercised in an appropriate manner in such matters.

( 2 ) AS was visualized by the Law Commission sometimes false accu- sations may be levelled against persons just with a view to cause them embarrassment arising out of the social stigma of an arrest and the circumstance that a man has to remain in jail albeit till he is released on bail. It may also happen that the competent authority may place a person (against whom an accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence is levelled) under arrest say on the eve of a holiday or at a time when the Courts are closed. The purpose of sec. 438 inter alia appears to be to secure that such a person is not obliged to go to jail till he is able to move the Count for being released on bail.

( 3 ) SEC. 438 itself is widely worded and does not engraft any limita- tions on the power of the Court in case a person who has rea






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top