J.B.MEHTA, P.D.DESAI
BRAHMCHARI SATYANARAYAN MAHARAJ – Appellant
Versus
KANTILAL L. DAVE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE question which arises in this revision application is whether in the context of the relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the New Code) an aggrieved person who invokes the revisional jurisdiction of the High Court directly without approaching the Sessions Court in the first instance could be refused relief on the ground that unless special cirumstances are made out his revision application cannot be entertained because he had failed to move the Sessions Court. Having regard to the importance of the question the matter has been referred to a Division Bench. We do not however propose to decide the entire case on merits. We shall only deal with and decide the question set out above and pass appropriate orders with regard to the disposal of the case on merits in accordance with the view which we ultimately take. Under the circumstances it is not necessary to set out the facts giving rise to the revision application
( 2 ) IN order to appreciate the proper dimension of the point at issue it would be necessary first to make reference to the relevant statutory provisions. Chapter XXVI of the Bombay High C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.