SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Guj) 60

S.H.SHETH
HARIJAN VITHALBHAI MADHAVBHAI – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNAMURTHY,the COLLECTOR,baroda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.B.SHAH, MUKESH R.PATEL

S. H. SHETH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has been in possession of survey No. 33 admeasuring Acre 1-33 Gunthas of village Utraj in Sinor Taluka of Baroda District. It was first granted to him on an Eksali lease by the Government for the year 1961-62. That lease was renewed from year to year until 1963-64. It was not renewed thereafter. The assessment of the land is Rs. 10-12 ps. After the expiry of the agricultural year 1963-64 the petitioner continued to be in unauthorised possession of that land. He wanted a permanent grant of that land to be made in his favour. He therefore made an application for that purpose to the Mamlatdar of Sinor. The Mamlatdar made his recommendation on that application and forwarded it to the Collector of Baroda. The Collector Baroda made an order on 25th July 1969 by which he granted the land to the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was required to pay to the Government the price of the land under sec. 62 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code and penalty for unauthorised occupation of that land from 1964-65 onwards. The Collector fixed Rs. 4500. 00 as the price of the land and he demanded of the petitioner Rs. 11250. 00 being 21/2 times the price of the land for fi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top