J.B.MEHTA, S.OBUL REDDY, B.K.MEHTA
SAIYED MOHAMMED ABDULLAMIYA URAIZEE (SINCE DECEASED BY HIS SUCCESSOR) – Appellant
Versus
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE Special Civil Applications which are before us are dismissed with costs. The reasons will follow. Interim relief if any granted in each of these petitions is vacated. Rule discharged.
( 2 ) THE learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in these petitions (except Special C. A. 1236/65) made an oral application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 133 (1) of the Constitution. We are unable to certify that any substantial question of law of general importance which in our opinion requires to be decided by the Supreme Court arises in this batch of Special Civil Applications. Leave refused.
( 3 ) THESE petitions were disposed of by the order dated August 12 1976 as under:-THESE Special Civil Applications which are before us are dismissed with costs The reasons will follow. Interim relief if any granted in each of these petitions is vacated. Rule discharged the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in these petitions (except Special C. A. 1236/65 made an oral application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court under Art. 133 (1) of the Constitution. We are unable to certify that any sub- stantial questi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.