SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Guj) 72

M.P.THAKKAR
PATEL PARSHOTTAMDAS CHATURBHAI – Appellant
Versus
HARIJAN SHAKARBHAI LAKHABHAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.K.TAKVANI, S.M.MANDAN, U.P.JADEJA

M. P. THAKKAR, J.

( 1 ) INCONCEIVABLE as it might appear Article 226 of the Constitution of India embedded therein to enable the Courts to remove injustice is often invoked (as in the present matter) in order to create rather than remove road blocks in the way of the Establishment even when it is sincerely striving to redress the centuries old injustice to backward class citizens in a small measure. Perhaps it is better to let the facts voice their own sentiments.

( 2 ) FIVE land owners from village Radhu in Matar taluka in Kaira district viz. Patel Parshottamdas Chaturbhai and four others have challenged a grant of lands in respect of two small parcels admeasuring 6 acres-27 gunthas and 3 acres 10 gunthas comprised in survey number 250 of the same village in favour of respondent No. 1 Harijan Shakarbhai Lakhabhai the promoter of a backward class co-operative society viz. Sahij Pachhat Varga Samudayik Sahakari Mandali as per order at annexure B dated May 31 1973 by way of this petition invoking the high prerogative jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

( 3 ) THE petitioners have challenged the impugned order of grant as per annexure E on the grou








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top