SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Guj) 68

M.P.THAKKAR
BABOO HUSAIN – Appellant
Versus
N. P. NOPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.K.PAREKH, S.M.MANDAN, Sirish Joshi

M. P. THAKKAR, J.

( 1 ) DOES a worker who is otherwise entitled to the protection of Payment of Wages Act forfeit the protection of the Act if he works overtime and claims overtime Wages in case his contractual wages along with the claim for overtime exceed the statutory limit and will the Act cease to apply to him in that event ? That is the question which has climbed to the top in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India invoked by a Boiler Attendant who was attending to the boiler installed in a factory belonging to the respondent at Jamnagar known as Bajrang Mills and Fertiliser Co. during all the three shifts every day. He has challenged the impugned order passed by the learned Assistant Judge of Jamnagar exercising appellate powers under sec. 17 of the Payment of Wages Act of 1936 hereafter called the Act where by the learned Assistant Judge has set aside the award for Rs. 14850. 00 made by the Payment of Wages Authority in favour of the petitioner and rejected the application made by the petitioner in toto. The learned appellate Judge has rejected the application of the petitioner inter alia on the ground as regards the applicability of the Act itself thou








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top