SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Guj) 111

R.A.MEHTA
SHAH OCHHAVLAL MOTILAL – Appellant
Versus
KANSARA DHANLAXMI BECHARLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: R.N.SHAH, V.P.Shah

R. A. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revisional Application by the original defendants is directed against the decree for possession of the rented premises on the ground of non-user under Section 13 (1) (k) of the Bombay Rent Act. The suit was filed on several grounds including the personal and bonafide requirement arrears of rent and non-user. All the other points have been negatived and only on the ground of non-user the decree has came to he passed.

( 2 ) THE claim of the plaintiff is that the suit property was let to the second defendant (petitioner No. 1) prior to 1950 and that suit premises have not been used at all from 1964 to 1971. The suit was filed on 2nd December 1971 Both the courts have held that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree for possession on the ground of non-user of the suit premises by the tenant.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioners-original defendants (father and son) has submitted that the finding of the lower courts is illegal and contrary to evidence on record and the onus is on the plaintiff to prove non-user within the period of six months immediately prior to the filing of the suit. On the other hand the learned counsel for the respondent-original p









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top