SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Guj) 31

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :M.K.SHAH, P.D.DESAI
BHARAT PREMJIBHAI - Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AHMEDABAD - Respondent
First Appeal 620 of 1974
Decided On : 04/10/1978

Advocates Appeared: G.N.DESAI, RASIKLAL N.OZA, S.P.DAVE

Headnote:

Workmen Compensation Act – Section 2 - Accident claim- Claim of compensation - Appellant is injured person claim for compensation arose out of an accident which occurred - Main Road from Hospital in city of actual spot of accident was place where by lane from meets main road opposite Hospital - Appellant at material time was proceeding in company of his brother Hospital side - A passenger bus run by Municipal Transport Service was following appellant and his brother and said bus was at material time driven by second respondent - When appellant reached spot of accident front left side of bus hit rear wheel of his cycle from behind - As a result of collision appellant fell down on road and two wheels of his cycle were crushed under front left side wheel of bus - Appellant himself sustained injuries as a result of impact and a portion of his body was run over by wheel of the bus – Held, Commissioner held that claimant was a carpenter by profession and that by loss of his left arm above elbow he was rendered unfit for work of carpenter as work of carpentry could not be done by one hand only - On basis of said reasoning Commissioner found that claimant had of his earning capacity and he awarded compensation on said footing - In appeal before Supreme Court at instance of owner of cinema hall it was inter alia urged that injury did not result in permanent total disablement of claimant and that Commissioner committed a gross error of law in taking that view as there was only permanent partial disablement within the meaning of Act - Supreme Court while rejecting said submission referred to definition of expression total disablement Order accordingly

M. K. SHAH, P. D. DESAI, J.

( 1 ) IN this case the claimant appellant is the injured person and the claim for compensation arose out of an accident which occurred on March 9 1972 at about 5-45 P. M. on the Main Road from Paldi to Vadilal Sarabhai Hospital in the city of Ahmedabad. The actual spot of accident was the place where the by lane from Madalpur meets the main road opposite the Vadilal Sarabhai Hospital. The appellant aged 15 at the material time was proceeding in the company of his brother Navin from Paldi to Vadilal Sarabhai Hospital side. A passenger bus run by the Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Service bearing No. G. T. A. 8580 was following the appellant and his brother and the said bus was at the material time driven by the second respondent. When the appellant reached the spot of accident the front left side of the bus hit the rear wheel of his cycle from behind. As a result of the collision the appellant fell down on the road and the two wheels of his cycle were crushed under the front left side wheel of the bus. The appellant himself sustained injuries as a result of the impact and a portion of his body was run over by the wheel of the bus. Briefly stated the injuries which the appellant received consisted of two contused lacerated wounds over the head and a contused lacerated wound on the sole of the right foot. The internal injury on the right foot consisted of a crack fracture. The appellant was immediately taken to the Vadilal Sarabhai Hospital where he was hospitalized in the first instance upto March 13 1972 It appears that as a result of some complication which resulted in pus formation on the site of the injury the appellant was again admitted in the Vadilal Sarabhai Hospital on March 23 1972 and he was an indoor patient till April 6 1972 Even after he was discharged from the hospital for the second time the appellant had to take treatment as an outdoor patient for a considerably long period and he developed a limp in the injured leg and other physical disabilities.

( 2 ) ON July 26 1972 the appellant presented an application to the Tribunal to prosecute the accompanying claim application in forma pauperis The appellants request to prosecute the proceedings in forma pauperis was granted on April 27 1973 and the Claim Application was registered on the said date. In the Claim Application the appellant claimed total compensation in the sum of Rs. 38 33 together with costs and interest. The claim was split up under various heads as follows:1 Rs. 500. 00: : medical treatment special diet and transport expenses2 Rs. 600. 00: : pecuniary loss suffered by the appellants father who had attended upon the appellant while he was in hospital and thereafter. 3 Rs. 500. 00 : future medical treatment. 4 Rs. 1,000. 00 : pecuniary loss suffered by the appellant upto Novem- ber 30 1973 on account of loss of earning at the rate of Rs. 50. 00 per month. 5 Rs. 18,000. 00 : future pecuniary loss at the minimum rate of Rs. 100 per month upon application of the multiplier of 15. 6 Rs. 10,000. 00 : loss of amenities and enjoyment of life. 7 Rs. 7,500. 00 : pain and suffering. 8 Rs. 1,000. 00 : loss of convenience. 9 Rs. 150. 00 : damage to the bicycle.

( 3 ) THE Tribunal upon appreciation of evidence on record came to the conclusion that the bus in question was being plied at the material time by the second respondent in the course of his employment and that the accident occurred on account of his rashness and negligence. The Tribunal therefore held that both the respondents were jointly and seve- rally liable for the compensation awardable to the appellant. The Tribunal awarded an amount of Rs. 21 325 as compensation under the follow- ing heads:rs. 500/- : Future medical treatment. RS. 225. 00 : Pecuniary loss suffered by the appellant upto July 26 1972 on account of loss of earning at the rate of Rs. 50 per month. RS. 8100/- : Future pecuniary loss at the rate of Rs. 45. 00 per month upon application of the multiplier of 15. RS



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top