SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Guj) 52

M.P.THAKKAR
SANKALCHAND VALJIBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
J. P. CHAVDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: F.M.KOLIA, N.K.BAROT, R.M.CHRISTIE

M. P. THAKKAR, J.

( 1 ) ). A citizen who was arrested by a police officer has approached this Court by way of the present petition and has made very serious allegations against the concerned police officer. A notice pending admission was issued and the officer concerned was directed to produce the petitioner in person before the Court. The learned Public Prosecutor was asked in what proceeding and under what provision the petitioner had been arrested. The learned Public Prosecutor after taking instructions from respondent No. 1 the P. S. I. who has made the arrest stated that a private complaint had been lodged against the petitioner in the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate 3 Court and that the Magistrate concerned had directed the police officer to make investigation in respect of the complaint under sub-sec. (1) of sec. 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1973 (Code ).

( 2 ) THE question that has surfaced in the back drop of the aforesaid facts and circumstances is: when upon receipt of a complaint of an offence a Magistrate instead of issuing process postpones the issue of process against the accused and directs a police officer to make an investigation for the purpose of





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top