( 1 ) THESE three proceedings arise out of an order passed by the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class at Mandvi-Kutch in Criminal Case No. 137/78 convicting the respondent-original accused for the offence under sec. 325 of the Criminal Procedure Code and instead of passing any sentence of punishment against him giving him benefit under the Probation and Offenders Act and ordering his release on his passing a bond of Rs. 2000. 00 with one surety in like amount for a period of two years for good conduct and imposing certain conditions under the Probation of Offenders Act (the Act) as also awarding compensation of Rs. 500. 00 to the heirs of the deceased payable by the accused under the provisions of sec. 5 (1) (a) of the Act. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

( 2 ) NOW so far as the appeal for enhancement is concerned it is contended on behalf of the accused that as in the instant case instead of passing an order of sentence the Court has passed an order of releasing the accused on probation under the Act no appeal for enhancement would lie to this Court under the provisions of sec. 377 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (the Code) which provides for an ap