SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Guj) 106

B.J.DIVAN, R.C.MANKAD
VALLABHBHAI KHUSHALBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.R.SHAH, J.R.NANAVATI, M.I.HAVA

B. J. DIVAN, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein has challenged under Art. 226 of the Constitution notifications under secs. 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act. The petitioner is the owner of agricultural land bearing survey No. 20 (paiki) admeasuring 4 Acres 26 Gunthas situated at village Sankari in Bardoli Taluka of Surat District. His land is part of survey No. 20/2. A portion of the said land admeasuring about one acre is waste and uncultivable and the remaining portion of the land is cultivable. The land is perennially irrigated and is watered by irrigation canal supplying water from Kakarapar Water Bund Scheme. The petitioners and his family members are cultivating the land personally. Sugarcane is the main crop grown in the land and the income derived by cultivation of this land is the main source of income of the petitioner and his family members. It is the petitioners case that as far back as May 1 1968 a notification under sec. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was issued stating that the land of the petitioner was likely to be needed for the construction of houses of Halpatis under the Halpati Housing Scheme. The petitioner opposed this proposed acquisition inter alia on the grou




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top