SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Guj) 78

S.H.SHETH, S.L.TALATI
GOLDEN TOBACCO CO. LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ANIL DIWAN, S.N.SHELAT

S. H. SHETH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act and has been engaged in the manufacture of cigarettes Amongst other places it has got a factory at Baroda. On the manufacture of cigarettes the petitioner company was called upon to ply excise duty. While determining the assessable value of cigarettes for the purpose of collecting excise duty the Central excise authorities included in it certain post manufacturing expenses such as advertisement expenses storage expenses marketing and distribution expenses and Bank charges and interest recovered by the petitioner Company from wholesale buyers who enjoy a certain credit. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise determined the assessable value after including therein expenses under all these heads. The petitioner appealed against the order to the Appellate Collector of Central Excise who confirmed it.

( 2 ) UNDER the aforesaid circumstances the petitioner has filed this petition in which two questions are raised for our decision : (1) Assessable value for excise duty cannot include post manufacturing expenses because excise duty is a tax on manufacture on production. (2) If post manufacturing

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top