S.H.SHETH, S.L.TALATI
NANALAL NAVALNATHJI YOGI – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF BULSAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner is the owner of a Motor truck bearing registration No. GTD. 5657. The firm of Chandrakant Champaklal approached the petitioner as that firm had a desire to transport 93 bags of rice and therefore ultimately on 29-4-1975 the truck left Ahmedabad with 93 bags of rice. The case of the petitioner is that these rice bags were to be delivered to one Sahebchand Surajmal at Vapi. Such a transport from Ahmedabad to Vapi was legal according to the petitioner. The petitioner had not accompanied the truck but the driver of the petitioner drove the truck and driver did not take turn towards Vapi. The truck was intercepted near Nandigam which is a small village and it is within five miles of the border of Maharashtra. It was suspected that the rice bags were being carried across the said border and thus it was suspected that 93 bags of rice were being exported without the permit from Gujarat to the State of Maharashtra. The driver was questioned but he could not produce the permit for export. The result was that the rice bags and the truck were seized. The driver was prosecuted for the breach of Clause 3 of the Gujarat Rice (Export Control) and P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.