SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Guj) 153

B.K.MEHTA, P.D.DESAI
SHARAD BANSILAL VAKIL – Appellant
Versus
SANKALCHAND HIMATLAL SHETH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.S.BHATTI, M.U.CHINUBHAI, V.M.TARKUNDE

B. K. MEHTA, P. D. DESAI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who is a senior advocate ordinarily practising in this High Court and was at the material time the Senior Standing Counsel of the Central Government has filed this Writ Petition against the Chief Justice (respondent No. 3) two Judges (respondents Nos. 1 and 2) Registrar (respondent No. 4) and an Assistant Registrar (respondent No. 5) of this High Court. The petitioner challenges herein the order dated 16/07/1980 passed by respondents Nos. 1 and 2 on his application dated 30/06/1980 (Annexure A) and the consequential refusal of respondents Nos. 4 and 5 to give to the petitioner inspection and certified copies of the relevant extracts from the Minute-books of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 as contrary to law ultra vires the respective powers and authority of the respondents illegal and void and liable to be quashed and set aside. The principal prayer in the petition is for the issue of a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction and/or order: (a) commanding the respondents or any one or more of them who have/has the custody of the Minute-books in which respondents Nos. 1 and 2 noted and recor







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top