SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Guj) 151

N.H.BHATT, S.L.TALATI
G. S. DUGAL and CO. (PRIVATE) LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AHMEDABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.S.SHAH, P.V.Nanavati, S.N.SHELAT

N. H. BHATT, S. L. TALATI, J.

( 1 ) ALL these are the appeals under sec. 411 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act 1949 brought to this court by three different appellants challenging the orders in the Municipal Valuation Appeals decided by the Judge of the Small Causes Court Ahmedabad befor whom the proceedings had arisen under sec. 406 of the Act. A schedule is appended to this judgment showing which appeal has arisen from which Municipal Valuation appeal in the Small Causes Court what property is involved and for which year the respective first Appeal is. All these appeals can be conveniently dealt with together and disposed of by this common judgment of course with the concurrence of the learned advocates appearing for the Corporation as well as Mr. P. V. Nanavati who is the advocate for the appellants in all these seven appeals.

( 2 ) THE question that arises in these seven appeals is whether a parking place which is required to be compulsorily kept by the owner of a commercial building can be made liable to general tax which is leviable under sec. 132 of the Act. It is common ground in all these appeals and the learned advocates appearing for the Corporation also
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top