SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Guj) 182

G.T.NANAVATI, S.H.SHETH
SONBAI PETHALJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.K.TAKVANI, GUPTA RAKESH, K.S.NANAVATI

G. T. NANAVATI, S. H. SHETH, J.

( 1 ) THIS group of 26 cases consists of 25 writ petitions and one Letters Patent Appeal. In ail these cases common questions of law arise. They are therefore decided by common judgment. The writ petition out of which Letters Patent Appeal No. 62 of 1978 arises was dismissed by the learned Single judge. In that petition also the questions which were raised are the questions raised now before us.

( 2 ) THE petitioners in all these cases are holders of quarry leases granted to them by the State Government under Gujarat Minor Mineral Rules 1966 These rules have been made by the State Government in exercise of the power conferred upon it by sec. 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act 1957 Under the leases granted to the petitioners the petitioners are liable to pay dead rent in respect of the area leased out of them for the purpose of excavation of minor minerals. The rates at which dead rent was prescribed prior to March 26 1979 were much lower than the rates at which it has been fixed after they were revised under the notification issued on March 26 1979 The revised rates came into force with effect from 1st April 1979.

( 3 ) THE






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top