Gujarat High Court
Judgename :B.J.DIVAN, B.K.MEHTA
SOMABHAI KACHARADAS PATEL - Appellant
Versus
PATEL BECHARBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI - Respondent
I.T.R. 466 of 1980
Decided On : 12/05/1980
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Sections 100, 114, 151 and 152, Order XLVII Rule (1) - Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Section 14 - Special Civil Application - Election - Corrupt practice was committed - In result of the votes, it was found at the time of the recount respondent No. 1 was declared as the successfully elected candidate and the appellant was declared to have lost the election - Appellant filed an election petition - Held, This principle of implied power cannot be read into provisions of section of Gujarat Municipalities Act because all that Tribunal has to decide is question of validity of that election and an injunction of type sought for in present case cannot be said to be necessary for proper determination of question before it nor can it be said that if such a relief is not granted result of election petition if successful would be rendered nugatory nor can it be said that jurisdiction of Election Tribunal would not be effectively exercised in absence of any such implied power - under these circumstances in first place application Exhibit for interlocutory injunction was itself not maintainable and applications was misconceived Secondly the provisions for appeal cannot apply because no substantive right of appeal against final order or against interlocutory order has been conferred and provisions of Order cannot be invoked in instant case because from very nature of things no substantive right of appeal either against final order or against interlocutory order if any is conferred upon any of parties to an election petition - Appeal dismissed
( 1 ) THESE three matters have been placed before us because of an order passed by our learned Brother A. N. Surti J. referring these matters to a larger Bench because of the importance of the questions involved in this Appeal from Order. Our learned Brother felt that since the matter is of public importance as it relates to an election dispute and as the question involved is one of reading and interpreting sec. 14 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act 1963 the matter should be heard and disposed of by a larger Bench.
( 2 ) ELECTIONS were held for the formation of municipality of Kalol District Mahesana. The elections were held on October 26 1980 Counting of votes was carried out on October 22 1980 and the result of the count was declared on October 30 1980 The Returning Officer found that the appellant in the present Appeal from Order Somabhai Kacharadas Patel had secured 642 votes whereas respondent No. 1 Patel Becharbhai Shambhubhai had secured 640 votes. At that stage a recount was requested and the Returning Officer granted the request for recount. After the recount it was found that respondent No. 1 had secured 642 votes whereas the appellant had secured 640 votes and because of the result of the votes as found at the time of the recount respondent No. 1 was declared as the successfully elected candidate and the appellant was declared to have lost the election. After the declaration of respondent No. 1 as elected councillor of Kalol Municipality Somabhai Kacharadas Patel the appellant before us filed an election petition being Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 37 of 1980 no November 6 1980 before the learned District Judge Mehsana. The District Judge is constituted the Tribunal to hear election petitions under the provisions of the Gujarat Municipalities Act 1963 During the pendency of the election petition before the learned District Judge Somabhai Kacharadas Patel the appellant filed the application Exhibit 5 and prayed for the following interim reliefs; (1) that the Government should not publish the names of elected councillors pursuant to the election held on October 26 1980 (2) that no first general meeting should be called under sec. 32 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act 1963 for the purpose of either electing the President or the Vice President of the Municipalityin this election petition the petitioner had joined the State of Gujarat and Kalol Nagar Palika that is Kalol Municipality as respondents to the election petition. It may be stated that the interim relief which was sought for was against the State of Gujarat against calling the first general meeting and relief restraining the Government from publishing the names of elected councillors was also sought for. At the initial stage the Tribunal issued notices to the respondents as he was of the view that it had no jurisdiction to grant the interim reliefs as prayed for by Exhibit 5.
( 3 ) AT that stage Somabhai Kacharadas Patel filed Special Civil Application No. 3292 of 1980 in this High Court. The Special Civil Application came up for admission on November 18 1980 before our learned Brother P. D. Desai J. The learned Single Judge was of the view that it would not be just and proper for this Court to intervene and to grant any relief on the special civil application. He observed that if the petitioner that is Somabhai Kacharadas Patel the appellant before us was unable to obtain any interim relief in the said proceedings it would be open to him to challenge the order of the Tribunal in that behalf.
( 4 ) P. D. Desai J. therefore allowed the petition in Special Civil Application No. 3292 of 1980 to be withdrawn After the dismissal of that Special Civil Application as withdrawn Somabhai Kacharadas Patel approached the Tribunal once again and pressed his application for interim reliefs but that application was rejected by the Tribunal. The present Appeal from Order has been filed by Somabhai Kacharadas Patel against his rival candidate wh
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.